今日说法观后感【优秀3篇】

看完某一作品后，相信你一定有很多值得分享的收获，这时候最关键的观后感不能忘了。在写观后感之前，可以先参考范文，这次漂亮的小编为您带来了今日说法观后感【优秀3篇】，希望可以启发、帮助到大家。

内容导航

今日说法观后感 篇1今日说法观后感 篇2今日说法观后感 篇3

今日说法观后感 篇1

非常关系

Very relevant

福州市一个雇主经常虐待家里的小保姆，终于有一天将小保姆殴打致死。为了毁尸灭迹，雇主的妻子假冒小保姆的姐姐将尸体火化。法院判决，雇主故意伤害死缓，妻子包庇有期徒刑3年。

An employer in Fuzhou often abused the baby sitter at home, and finally beat the baby sitter to death one day. In order to destroy the body, the employer's wife posed as the sister of a baby sitter and cremated the body. The court ruled that the employer intentionally injured him with a reprieve of death, and his wife was sentenced to three years' imprisonment for covering up.

专家分析，雇主和保姆不是主人和仆人的关系，双方的地位是平等的。国家应该对劳动法进行修改以保障象保姆这种存在个人雇佣关系的人的合法利益，现在他们的利益得不到任何保证。另外，为了约束保姆的行为，雇主应该与保姆签定好合同，或者借助司法机关的力量。

According to expert analysis, employers and nannies are not masters and servants, and their status is equal. The state should amend the labor law to protect the legitimate interests of people who have personal employment relationships such as nannies. Now their interests cannot be guaranteed. In addition, in order to restrict the behavior of the nanny, the employer should sign a contract with the nanny, or with the help of the judicial authority.

今日说法观后感 篇2

今天看了央视一套的今日说法栏目，这期节目讲的是农村留守儿童犯罪的案件。

I watched today's talk show of CCTV. This program is about crimes committed by children left behind in rural areas.

此案件中主人公是两个中学生郑清和薜谨，父母都在外打工，平时生活都有爷爷奶奶照顾。郑清家里家境稍微宽裕点，父母经常会给他寄点零用钱，而同学薜谨家里家境比较拮据，可是薜谨又迷上了电脑游戏，所以经常会向同学郑清借钱，这次他问同学郑清又借了900元钱，因为平时借的钱薜谨都是偷偷的把家里的口粮拿去卖了还钱，可是这次由于借的钱多卖口粮会被家里人发现，所以薜谨动了把同学杀死就不用还钱的歪念，就这样两个年轻的生命都毁了，一个死了一个被判无期徒刑剥夺**权利终身。

The protagonists in this case are Zheng Qing and Xue Jin, two middle school students. Their parents are working outside, and their grandparents take care of them in daily life. Zheng Qing's family is a little better off. His parents often send him some pocket money. Xue Jin's family is quite poor, but Xue Jin is addicted to computer games, so he often borrows money from Zheng Qing. This time, he asked Zheng Qing to borrow another 900 yuan, because Xue Jin stealthily sold his family rations to pay back the money he borrowed. But this time, because he borrowed more money to sell rations, his family will find out, So Xue Jin thought that he would not have to pay back the money if he killed his classmates. In this way, the lives of two young people were destroyed, one died and the other was sentenced to life imprisonment and deprived of their rights for life.

今日说法观后感 篇3

后果真的很严重

The consequences are really serious

陈兵在火车站发现一个小偷偷自己的包，便去追赶。追了大概有200米路程。结果猝死。小偷与他并没有任何身体上的接触。运动医学专家分析说他可能是因为心脏问题而突然死亡的。

Chen Bing found a small bag secretly in the railway station and went to catch up with it. It was about 200 meters after the chase. The result was sudden death. The thief had no physical contact with him. Sports medicine experts analyzed that he may have died suddenly due to heart problems.

专家分析说小偷的盗窃行为与陈兵的死亡有因果关系。但是只构成盗窃罪。量刑时可以酌情作为一个加重情节。小偷对陈兵的死有过错，但是陈兵的家人并没有向小偷提起民事赔偿要求。最后，小偷由于盗窃未遂被判4年，罚金3000。

Experts analyzed that the theft of the thief had a causal relationship with Chen Bing's death. But it only constitutes theft. Sentencing can be used as an aggravating circumstance as appropriate. The thief was at fault for Chen Bing's death, but Chen Bing's family did not claim civil compensation from the thief. Finally, the thief was sentenced to 4 years and fined 3000 for attempted theft.